Was america justified in dropping the atom bomb on hiroshima in august 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on 6th august 1945 on hiroshima and on 9th august on nagasaki, japan by the order president of america, harry s truman these two events are the only use of nuclear weapons in history up to date in most. A question like this is insulting by assuming that the united states did something wrong when we defended ourselves and bombed their cities the people who argue against the use of bombs seem to have no idea of the circumstances of their use and no idea of what the alternatives were it demonstrates a complete. More than seventy years after the end of world war ii, the decision to drop the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki remains controversial historians and the public continue to debate if the bombings were justified, the causes of japan's surrender, the casualties that would have resulted if the us had. The first bomb, dropped on the city of hiroshima on 6 august 1945, resulted in a death toll of around 135000 the second, which hit nagasaki on 9 august, killed at least 50000 people – according to some estimates, as many as 74000 died but was the us justified in dropping the atomic bombs. Was the united states justified in dropping the atomic bomb on japan on august 6, 1945, the united states became the first country to ever use the atomic bomb in warfare on this day, the first of the two atomic bombs were dropped the first was known as little boy and was dropped on the city of hiroshima the second. Aug 6 and aug 9 marked the 65th anniversaries of the dropping of the atomic bombs on the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki there was no justification to using the atomic bombs with the exception it was a new weapon that needs to be tested and war is where new weapons are used for.
The third, final, and most important reason the americans were justified in dropping atomic bombs on japan was that the bombings claimed far less lives than would i couldn't've worked it in because my teacher was really adamant that it be a five paragraph essay, if i worked a sixth paragraph in there would be hell to pay. Yet the question will not die, nor should it: was dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki a military necessity was the decision justified by the imperative of saving lives or were there other motives involved the question of military necessity can be quickly put to rest japan was already. Was america justified in dropping the atomic bomb on hiroshima definitily yes essay by laxchick_31, high school, 11th grade, a+, june 2004 download word definitely yes the atomic bomb ended the war, saved hundreds of thousands of peoples lives, nation's economy, and prevented us from having future wars. On august 6th, 1945, the atomic bomb was dropped on hiroshima the casualties in hiroshima were over 200000 3 days later, on august 9th, the atomic bomb.
The second atomic bomb was dropped on nagasaki just three days after the first bomb due to the japanese government failure at offering up their unconditional surrender the second bomb was nicknamed 'fat man' many people asked, was america justified in dropping the atomic bomb on japan. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought japan to her knees and ended the horrible war if the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered. He feared that germany was trying to build an atomic bomb, while the united states was sitting idle although wwii had not yet started, germany was clearly a threat, and if the germans had a monopoly on the atomic bomb, it could be deployed against anyone, including the united states, without warning.
But whether the bombs are actually what brought the war to a close—and whether that kind of civilian death toll can ever be justified to prevent hypothetical future carnage—remain topics of fierce debate among historians atomic cloud over nagasaki the atomic cloud over nagasaki (credit: hiromichi. Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified essay 2487 words jun 21st, 2014 10 pages show more did the usa need to drop bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in 1945 on the 6th of august 1945, the us dropped an atomic bomb on the japanese city of hiroshima,1ushering in the nuclear age the bomb caused. The bombing of two heavily populated cities, which resulted in the deaths of more than 100,000 civilians and an even greater number of casualties, cannot be easily justified regardless of the attack's outcome thus, controversy still surrounds the american use of atomic bombs against the japanese cities of hiroshima and.
Free essay: they slaughtered thousands of chinese civilians during the rape of nanking in 1937 it was necessary for america to drop the bomb henry l. Although the moral case against the use of the atomic bomb is a compelling one, it is essential to place the use of the atomic bombs in the context of the second world war, where the use of these weapons was morally justified the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki were justified in the historical context of the second.
Free essay: a retired major, richard gordon, was a pow in japan and said, the dropping of the bomb saved the lives of all of us being held in japan there. In 1945, the united states dropped two atomic bombs on japan, ending world war ii the manhattan project was the us government program during world war ii that developed and built these first atomic bombs detonation of these first nuclear was the decision to drop the atom bombs on civilians morally justifiable.